B2B Analysts
About the Company   Services   Research   Pressroom  
ERP
CRM
SCM
SRM
Infrastructure
Profit Optimization
Sarbanes
Sourcing
Analytics
IT Effectiveness
Architecture
Strategy
Transformation

The Biz

Protecting the Customers

There's always been an idea in the analyst business that analysts ought to be something like Consumer Reports, a trustworthy source of independent information. Anybody who's been in the business long enough knows, however, that there isn't enough consumer money out there to fund that kind of objectivity. The only kind of analyst business that allows the analysts to live comfortably in expensive suburbs is the business that takes money from the vendors.

As you know, B2B Analysts, Inc., doesn't do this. At the same time, we try not to be too holier than thou. People have to live, after all. Besides, 99% of all analysts feel that they can manage to do what they do ethically, balancing the demands of the vendors against the demands of truth and the consumer in a fair and reasonable way. Maybe it isn't what Consumer Reports does, but after all, this is the software business.

Then, every so often, we step back and wonder. Most recently, what gave us pause was the analyst community reaction to what Oracle calls "SAP's upgrade fees," the charges that SAP levies to "upgrade" their software contract, a fee that must be paid if you want to move to later versions of the software.

Oracle doesn't usually try to make a fair and balanced case when talking about SAP, but in this case they seem to have gotten it pretty much right. SAP is charging an extra fee to customers, who are already paying maintenance fees, which they have to pay if they want to upgrade their software.

I spent a ridiculous amount of time last winter asking SAP for some explanation of this. Analyst relations simply blew me off, telling me that their experts didn't have time to answer questions like this. The silly and implausible "explanations" that they did try to supply were simply embarrassing. Evidently, this was the first even semi-critical reaction to the levying of these fees.

Now, if there were even a strong streak of independence in the analyst community, I would have expected a storm of protest. Au contraire. At least one leader at a major analyst firm had the gall to stand up and defend this.

By now, of course, it's a dead issue. Oracle has gone on to other ways of criticizing SAP. Most customers have apparently paid the tax and upgraded their contracts (even though they haven't upgraded the software). So maybe the analyst community was right. Maybe it wasn't a big enough issue to risk the huge fees from SAP over. But if not that, then what?

The Biz is sent out free by e-mail to the B2B community.


Short Takes

September 1 , 2006

Is Oracle Fusion evolutionary or revolutionary?
More...

Attention former PeopleSoft and JDE customers!

Get a free copy of the only completely unbiased assessment of Oracle's strategy for its Fusion Applications Suite.

B2B Analysts occasionally publishes in-depth analyses of industry trends called Short Takes, which it provides to qualified readers free of charge. If you are a CIO, hold a C-level position at a software ccompany, or are a financial analyst, please click on the link below and fill out the short form, and you will be put on our list.

Subscribe to Short Takes